Yearly Archives: 2021

Differences between the 9N and 2N

Differences between the 9N and 2N – Francois Polain:

The Ford-Ferguson has always been a subject of interest to me and I’ve read a great deal about it. Although these articles were very informative I still couldn’t exactly tell the difference between a 9N and a 2N, so I decided to gather some information and classify all the changes by year of production. I hope this article will be of interest for some members and if there is something wrong/missing please do correct me!

The reason to introduce the 2N was World War II, by designating a new model Ford was able to bypass wartime restrictions and raise the price. The 2N had some component changes due to wartime shortages like the battery and alternator which were eliminated and replaced by a magneto and hand-crank start. Also, steel wheels became standard equipment. Luckily the great Harry Ferguson was able to convince the government that tractors were as important on the farm as war products to the army. This meant that tractors could soon be fitted with rubber tires and electric equipment again.

There is no 2N prefix on the serial numbers, all 2N tractors retained the 9N prefix. There were a couple of variations of the prefix; 9NAN was for kerosene burning tractors, 9NBN for industrial tractors and BN025 and BN040 was used for MotoTug tractors.
Harry Ferguson with his hands on his hips standing next to Henry Ford.

The first year of production was 1939, models of this year are characterised by a cast aluminium grill with horizontal slots. The mudguards had two ribs and the tinwork was fitted on the mudguard bracket only using rivets. Apparently only the first 700 9N’s were fitted with a cast aluminium bonnet, these bonnets are often sanded back to bare aluminium and polished by enthusiasts. The generator fitted is a 2-brush model.

,em.The early mudguard showing the two ribs and the rivet fixings.

In 1940 the double rib mudguards are replaced by single rib mudguards. The engine block is now provided with freeze out plugs which wasn’t the case in 1939. The ignition key switch is switched from t he right to the left side of the dash. The 2­ brush generator is replaced by a 3-brush type. The third brush on this type of generator is connected to the field winding of the dynamo, the other end of the field winding is connected to a switch which can he adjusted (by inserting or removing resistance) to give ‘low’ or ‘high’ charge. This switch was sometimes combined with the vehicle’s light switch so that switching on the headlights simultaneously put the dynamo in high charge mode). The battery lid is changed from clip held to hinged.

The three variations of steering wheels used.

In 1941, the last year of production of the 9N, a new steering wheel with three covered spokes instead of four is introduced. The grill is replaced by a steel model with vertical spokes to replace the aluminium grill with horizontal spokes.

The smooth centre rear axle.

The ‘smooth axle’ is replaced by a stronger two piece riveted axle hub around serial number 9N4l500. A wider 10×28″ rear tyre and wheel was offered as an option to replace the standard Xx32″ rear tyres. The ignition switch is relocated again but this time on the steering column. The starter button is switched from the left side of the dash to a spol in front of the gear lever and acts as a safely device to prevent from starting in gear.

1942 is the beginning of the 2N production, parts left over from (he 9N are used up on the 2N. The steering whee is changed to a 3-spoked wheel with exposed metal spokes. A final change is made to the grill which now has a slotted centre bar.

The holes in the rear axle housing to bolt on the mudguards are no longer solid but they are opened up to create an upper and lower hole, I imagine it was to reduce costs? A new front axle/radiator support replaces the earlier cast iron support and the bonnet side panels are modified to have a mounting bolt accessible from the outside. Last but not least the Ford badge on the bonnet has an engraved 2N on the lower edge and all items that used to be chrome plated are now painted due to war restrictions.

The early type grill.

The later type grill.

The earlier bonnet with internal side panel mounting bolts.

The later bonnet with mounting bolt accessible from the outside.

From 1943 onwards very little changes are made until 1947, the only changes made this year is a pressurised radiator and 8×32” inch rear tyres were discontinued.

In 1944 the transmission input shaft is modified to have helical cut gears and the I-beam radius rods replaced by oval rods.

Heavier rear axle housings were introduced in mid-1945 and they were again strengthened in 1946. These were the only changes made in 1945-46.

Finally in the last year of production of the 2N (1947) a casting number and date is added.

Francois Polain: Published in Journal No.84 Winter 2016/17


Ford 9N and 2N Specification

“Little known things about a Classic Tractor that changed the world.”
Researched by Robert Brown.

1939 9N
ENGINE: 4 cylinder L head BORE: 3. 187 x 3.75
PISTON DISPLACEMENT: 119.7 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO: 6 to 1 HORSEPOWER: Maximum Belt HP. 23.87 Rated Belt HP 85% of max . 20.29
DRAWBAR: 2-14″ plow capacity with Ferguson hydraulically operated imple­ments. Maximum drawbar without Fer­guson hydraulic system control. 16.9 HP
Rated HP. 75% of maximum 12.68 GOVERNOR: Variable speed, controlled from steering column. working range, up to 2200 rpm .
LUBRICATION: by gear pump supplying direct pressure oiling to crankshaft. camshaft, connecting rod bearings, and timing gears.
CRANKCASE OIL CAPACITY: 6 U.S. quarts
OIL FILTER: replaceable cartridge type of large capacity
IGNITION: Direct-driven battery dis­tributor in unit with coil in waterproof housing. Fully automatic spark advance.
GENERATOR: 6-volt shunt wound with vibrator type voltage regulation.
STARTER: 6-volt conventional type automobile starter with finger operated switch on dash.
BATTERY: 6-volt, 85 ampere-hour capacity. 13 high plates
COOLING: Pump circulation of water through tube and fin type radiator; fan (pusher) 4 blade 16″, belt driven; pump is packless type with pre-lubricated bearings.
COOLING SYSTEM CAPACITY: 14 U.S. quarts
FUEL SUPPLY; welded steel tank carried in engine hood. capacity 9 gal plus 1 gal reserve. Fuel filter is stan­dard equipment.
CARBURETOR: Up-draft, plain tube type of sturdy. dust-proof construc­tion.
AIR CLEANER: oil bath type with dust receptacle easily removed for cleaning. MUFFLER: reverse flow type; fitted as standard equipment to carry exhaust to rear of tractor.
CLUTCH: single dry plate 9″ effective diameter plate. pressure increased by centrifugal force as engine speed is in­creased.
TRANSMISSION: sliding gear, 3 speeds forward ,1 reverse. All shafts mounted on tapered roller bearings. Final Drive: spiral bevel gear with straddle-mounted pinion 6.66 to 1 ratio. Four pinion differential mounted to tapered roller bearings. Drive axle of semi-floating type with axle shaft and wheel hub integral. also carried on tapered roller bearings
DRAWBAR: adjustable type, standard equipment
TRANSMISSION SPEEDS:
Gear Final Gear Reduction
Speed @ 1400 rpm
Low 73.3 to 12.51 mph
Second 57.0 to 13.23 mph
High 24.6 to 17.48mph
Reverse 68.4 to 12.69 mph
STEERING: bevel pinion and twin bevel controlling both front wheels indepen­dently. Tread of front axle adjustable without disturbing any steering connec­tion. Rubber covered steel 4-spoke steering wheel, 18″ diameter
POWER TAKE OFF: shaft extends from rear of axle housing with standard spline end. for fitting to drive shaft of power driven equipment, 509 rpm at engine speed of 1400 rpm. Extra equipment – Belt Pulley carried by self­-contained drive unit quickly attachable to same area of tractor.
BRAKES: 14″ x 2″ internal expanding, two shoe, full energizing type. One simple accessible adjustment. Brakes operating independently on each rear wheel controlled by separate pedals to facilitate short turning.
WHEELS. FRONT: steel disc fitted with 4 x 19 single rib pneumatic tyres on drop centre rim. 26 psi.
WHEELS. REAR: steel disc fitted with 8 x 32 traction tread pneumatic tyres on drop centre rim, 12 psi.
HYDRAULIC IMPLEMENT CONTROL: consists of a 4 cylinder pump supplying 011 under pressure to ram cylinder. Con­trol valve (on suction side of the im­mersed pump) is regulated by hand and automatically. Lever convenient to operator’s right hand gives instant con­trol of implement.
SHIPPING WEIGHT: approximately 2140lbs
WHEELBASE: 70″
NORMAL TREAD: Front and rear, 48″ FRONT TREAD: Adjustable by means of telescoping axle and reversing front and rear wheel discs to 76″ in 4″ steps. REAR TREAD: Adjustable by means of reversible wheel disc and reversible tyre rim to 76″ in 4″ steps.
OVERALL WIDTH: 64″
OVERALL LENGTH: Front tyre fin to end of lower link, 115″
OVERALL HEIGHT: 52″
GROUND CLEARANCE: 13″ under centre, 21″ under axles.
MINIMUM TURNING CIRCLE: 15ft with use of brakes.

THINGS TO LOOK FOR BY YEAR: 1939
Front axle grease fittings face forward. Hood is cast before #4000
PTO and pulley attachment different before #7453
No safety starter
Starter button located next to ammeter Key located next to oil pressure gauge Ignition indicator below ammeter
Left brake pedal same casting as the right pedal
Grill is cast aluminium, horizontal bars Cover (hood top battery) not hinged until #10213
Both hinged and not-hinged available until #13884
Hinged became standard in 1940 at #13885

1940
2 brush generator and cutout, 9N10000A, replaced by 3 brush units, 9N10000B, on 15/3/1940. Safety Starter Switch mechanically interlocked with gear shift lever, introduced at #12500 with some exceptions: 14 trac­tors were produced before #10732 which was the first; then #11148: #11400, #11470, #11497, then several in the #12000’s. After # 12500, there were 43 tractors produced with #12853 being the last of the non-safety starter models.
First ignition key location on the safety start models is in the right hand lower side of dash; second location is in the lower left hand side of dash. 

1941
Hydraulic lift cylinder and hydraulic lift spring were changed at #47020 to heavier duty type.
Left hand brake pedal changed: now has small hoop in it (to facilitate hand use of brake while executing a left hand turn) Front axle grease fittings face rear. Ignition key location again. moved to left top side of steering gear assembly. Rear axle changed to 2-piece riveted assembly.
Transmission case changed at #47508 Transmission Oil Level Indicator changed at #47508
4-blade pusher fan now obsolete 6-blade pusher or pull type takes its place
(Service Bulletin #26, 29 Aug 1940, shows 6-bladed fan #9N8600B is sup­plied where extreme heat is ex­perienced)
Steel grill with solid centre and vertical rods replaces cast aluminium grill Larger. heavy-duty generator assy. 3­brush. introduced at #9N100000C
Steel rear wheel 9N11700 in parts book FORD rear tyres only in size 10 x 28. 4 ply

1942 2N
10 x 28 rear tyres become standard, 8 x 32 optional
Steering housing no longer cast, now made of steel;
Dash, steel at #80769
Steering wheel changed to 3-spoke, exposed spokes.
Stud to hold valve cover changed at #100000 to hold larger cover; cover also changed
No longer any chrome on 2N tractor
Cap and radiator changed to a pressure system at #109502 and now has 12 quart capacity (Service Bulletin # 139. 29 May 1944 indicates current produc­tion tractors are equipped with pressure type cooling system and fan shroud)

1943
Front spindle and spindle arms changed at #109503
Lynch pin and ring became spring-­loaded (the spring loaded lynch pin. now universal the world over, was invented by John Chambers, senior Ferguson engineer. Problems with trash had resulted in the old ring pins jumping out) Crankshaft rachet and hand crank changed
9N starting crank 25. 22″ long and can be used on 9N. 2N. 8N. 1939 to 1952 2N starting crank 24.84″ long used with 2N.

1943-1947
Magneto introduced
Hood panel. right hand side. replaces 9N panel.
(2N panel is to have front choke control rod. magneto tractors only) 9 x 32 rear tyres supplied (fits 8 x 32 rim); 8 x 32 now obsolete.

1944
Front support assembly pin and radius rods changed at #167488
All tractors after #140774 have helical gears with HX stamped on transmission case flange to indicate tractors with helical gears
Tractors #86271 to #168259 produced without intake valve seat insert. W. P . B. (War time controls) restrictions Headlight assembly now equipped with sealed beams

1945
Heavier rear axle housing introduced at #174650

1946
Heavier duty rear axle housing assembly appears to replace RH 9N-40 12-B and 2N-4035. LH 9N-40 13. and 2N­4035. These were the heaviest and had a date stamped on outside. front 2N-4012-A2 RH
2N-4013-A2 LH

1947 (could not find any changes for this year)

I am sure I missed something, and will appreciate it if anyone can bring any missing, incomplete. or incorrect items to my attention. I will try to do the 8N next. They were made for a shorter time but have more changes than the 9N and 2N.

This article is reproduced by kind permission of the 9N-2N-BN NEWSLETTER

Published in Ferguson Club Journal Volume 3 No.2 Autumn 1990


The Little Grey Fergie 1946-1956

Chris Graham spotlights the Ferguson TE-20 range of tractors;
machines that took the world of farming into a new era of
mechanisation, convenience and efficiency

Two of Gary Anderson’s ‘little grey Fergies, a TE-F 20 and a 1950 TE-A 20 with a Ferguson TVO conversion (not built as a TE-D 20).

Ferguson tractor enthusiasts are a lucky bunch. For many people new to the old tractor hobby, deciding on the make and model to buy can be an involved and time-consuming process. There are so many tempting possibilities that making a final choice can be agonising. For the Ferguson fan, however, it’s plain sailing as, within the family fold, there sits perhaps the most influential and iconic tractor of all time.

The ‘little grey Fergie’ is the machine that’s widely regarded as being the one that changed agriculture around the world, forever. The brainchild of Harry Ferguson, this fantastically functional little tractor with its revolutionary three-point linkage – and the system of dedicated implements and support networks that he masterminded around it – probably did more for farmers across the globe than any other tractor you could think of.

Harry Ferguson put a great deal of time, effort and development money into making sure the little grey Fergie was comfortable to use, easy to handle and a solid performer. Time has proved he was successful on all counts.

The icon arrives

The TE-20, as the little grey Fergie was officially known at the start (T = Tractor, E = England, 20 = approximate engine power), was produced between 1946 and 1956, and more than 500,000 were built, mainly at the Ferguson factory in Banner Lane, Coventry. Harry Ferguson and Sir John Black, who was head of the Standard Motor Company, agreed a deal that would see the new model built at the existing Standard factory.

Ferguson had a very clear vision for the new tractor, and was determined to produce a lightweight model that would use as little fuel as possible, thereby maximising profits for farmers. However, as the new tractor’s Standard produced engine wasn’t ready in time, it was decided to fit the first models with a unit produced in Michigan, USA, by the Continental Motors Corporation, The Continental Z-120 was a four-cylinder, 1,962cc, petrol-powered motor with an output of 23hp, however, its carburettor had to be adapted to cope with the poor-quality fuel being used in post-war Britain.

The engine was run by a six-volt Lucas ignition system (complete with an electric starter), and linked to the rear wheels via a four-speed, constant-mesh gearbox with helical-cut gears. The engine starter was activated using the gear selector lever, and Harry Ferguson took a sometimes fanatical interest in every aspect of the tractor’s design. His fundamental aims were to produce a machine that was both easy and comfortable for farmers to use.

Harry Ferguson made a big effort to keep the TE-20 as light as possible, to maximise ease of use, manoeuvrability and fuel efficiency.

A slow start

But production got off to a relatively slow start, with just 316 TE-20s leaving the factory during 1946. At that time, the tractor cost £343 and was being built by a workforce of 3,500 people in a state-of-the-art factory. The planned increase in production during early 1947 was hampered by steel shortages, a fuel crisis and one of the coldest winters in living memory. However, things had picked up by the middle of the year, when 100 TE¬20s were leaving the factory every day. By the end of 1947, more than 20,000 had been built, about 5,000 of which were shipped overseas. Business was beginning to boom. As I’ve already mentioned, Harry Ferguson had been at pains to support his new tractor with a practical range of perfectly-matched implements, all of which were literally tested to destruction before being approved. In addition, Ferguson himself insisted on using and assessing each new implement before final permission was given for its introduction to the range. His laudable ambition was to provide a piece of equipment that, in conjunction with the tractor, was able to tackle every major job on the farm. In so doing he hoped to eliminate the traditional drudgery associated with so much of farming, produce cheaper food as a result and, overall, make the world a better place.

Diesel-engined Fergies tend to fetch the most money nowadays, followed by the TVOs then the petrols. The latter are not as economical.

Right from the off, customers could choose from a selection of implements that included a two-furrow plough, a mower, an earth scoop, a transport box, a cordwood saw, a three-ton trailer, a ridger, a tiller, a disc harrow and a pair of rowcrop cultivators, Development was a continual process though and, during 1947, the company added a post-hole digger, a steerage hoe and a spring-toothed harrow. All implements, while designed by Ferguson, were manufactured by trusted independent specialists. For example, the ploughs were made by Rubery Owen at its factory in Staffordshire, and that company supplied just over 17,500 units in 1947.

In keeping with Ferguson’s ‘complete support’ ethos, the company also introduced a comprehensive range of accessories, which included essenlials such as Sankey-made steel wheels, Lucas lighting sets, a canvas tractor cover and a clever, Sun Engineering produced jack that utilised the tractor’s hydraulic system to lift the whole machine off the ground.

Lucas lighting was a popular optional extra, and consisted of a single headlight, sidelights and a ploughing light.

Standard engine arrives

During the summer of 1947, the development of Standard’s own petrol engine neared completion. Ferguson had requested that it be based on the successful and reliable Continental Z-120, and the result was an 1,849cc four-cylinder unit producing 25hp.It differed from the Z-120 in that it featured an external oil filter and used a Zenith carburettor. Then, as an added bonus, the designers discovered that the new engine was also perfectly suited to automotive use, so it was utilised in the Standard Vanguard car as well.

With the introduction of the Standard engine, the model designation changed to TE-A 20 but, once again, things got off to a slow start. The factory was confident of producing 1,000 engines a day by the end of 1947 but, in reality, the first TE-A 20s didn’t start appearing in the field until the end of January, 1948, and Continental-engined TE-20’s remained on sale for most of that same year.

The first narrow version appeared in the autumn of 1948, with the rear wheel track reduced from 52 to 42in. The modifications needed to achieve this were primarily carried out by Kent·based Ferguson dealer, Lenfield Engineering Company, and those with Continental engines were designated TE-B 20 while the versions powered by the new Standard motor were TE-C 20s. Already the designation letter selection was starting to get confusing!

Then, in 1949, the UK authorities ended the ‘red petrol’ scheme, which had allowed petrol to be rebated for agricultural purposes. This resulted in a significant increase in the price of tractor fuel for farmers, at which point Ferguson reacted by introducing a vaporising oil-powered model (TVO) that would be cheaper to run. This version – introduced in May and christened the TE-D 20 was based around a bigger-bore, lower-compression Standard engine, to counteract the efficiency loss associated with the inferior fuel. The engine was fitted with a distinctive, aluminium heat shield over the inlet manifold, to promote fuel vaporisation, and a water temperature 9auge was added to the dash.

Dual fuel tanks

The 26hp TE-D 20 also featured dual fuel tanks under the hinged bonnet, because the engine had to be started and warmed using petrol, then switched over to run on the cheaper vaporising oil thereafter, using a new, three-way fuel tap. A narrow version soon followed, called the TE-E 20, and the 100,000th TE-20 left the factory on June 13th, 1949. An impressive 12,000 tractors went for export in that same year but, in some markets, the quality of fuel available was so low that a further modification was needed. Ferguson’s solution was to introduce the ‘zero octane’ or ‘Lamp oil’ model in April 1950, with the designation TE-H 20. A narrow version followed – the TE-J 20 – and both these 22hp variants utilised a lower compression ratio and retarded ignition settings to avoid pinking.

Additional implements – including a potato spinner and planter, a manure loader and spreader, a subsoiler and a weeder – were added to the range in 1950, and it was during this year that the total number of implements sold hit 350,000. In March 1951 the six-volt Lucas electrical system was discontinued, so an engineering change to the bell housing was required to accommodate the bigger starter motor that would be running on the new 12-volt ignition system.

By this time diesel power was on the horizon, even though Harry Ferguson was never a fan, He regarded diesel engines as dirty and noisy and, from an engineering point of view, considered them unnecessarily heavy, complicated and expensive. However, being the expert marketeer that he was, he grudgingly had to accept that diesel represented the way forward. Competitor tractors were heading in that direction, and farmers were attracted by the cost-effectiveness, reliability and usable performance that diesel engines delivered.

Henry Anderson at the whell of the TE-F 20 with it’s vertical exhaust.

Diesel trials

Three diesel engines were trialled – a unit from Standard, the three-cylinder Perkins P3 and a four-cylinder motor from Meadows. The last of these performed the best, but was a poor starter and costly, while the installation of the Perkins engine necessitated a raising of the bonnet line, which Ferguson objected to. More importantly, it also raised the tractor’s centre of gravity, which wasn’t desirable. So, by a process of elimination, Ferguson settled upon Standard’s offering, the 20C. To overcome its inherent cold starting issues, a Ki-Gass pump and induction heater were added, and the resultant diesel model – TE-F 20 – was presented to an expectant market in March, 1951. It cost £490 and featured a distinctive pair of six-volt batteries fitted on either side of the driver’s seat.

The TE-F 20 proved to be an extremely successful model, and Standard also made use of the 20C engine to power a diesel version of the Vanguard, creating the UK’s first diesel-powered production car which, incidentally, was capable of returning 50mpg. Ferguson also introduced a dedicated vineyard model in May 1952, with a width of just 46in and three engine options; petrol TE-K 20, TVO TE-l20 and lamp oil TE-M 20.

A petrol-powered, road-legal Industrial model (rE-P 20) was introduced in April 1951, and proved so popular that TVO¬(TE-R 20) and lamp oil-powered (TE-S 20) versions were added to the range in 1952. Early the following year a diesel Industrial (TE-T 20) version arrived, after which the TVO and lamp oil-powered versions started being phased out.

The simple dashboard features the Ki-gas hand pump on the right, with original operating instructions on the panel beneath.

Ownership prospects

For some down-to-earth feedback on TE-20 ownership, I took a trip to rural Buckinghamshire to meet Gary Anderson, his son Henry and the interesting variety of TE-20s they own. One of the first points that Gary raised was that the TE-20 – whichever engine you choose – makes an excellent tractor to own, whatever your level of experience within the hobby. “This tractor really does tick all the right boxes,” Gary told me. “it’s a machine that’s still perfectly capable of a decent days work, assuming you’re not wanting to run large, heavy implements. For small-scale ploughing, paddock-cutting and any of the 101 other jobs you can tackle around the farm or smallholding with the countless Ferguson System implements, it’s just about perfect. Easy to handle, manageable to drive and incredibly capable.”

When it comes to buying, Gary’s advice is to be sure about what you want the tractor for. ·One of the beauties of the TE-20 range is that you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a decent example, but your choice will be made easier if you’re clear about your intentions for the tractor. I help lots of people source tractors and always take the time to chat with them about their Intentions first.

“If somebody simply wants a cheap tractor to cut grass or cart logs around, then originality isn’t a vital issue. On the other hand, if the objective is to own a tractor that’s authentic and that wi. hold its own at shows and rallies, then finding a decent example will take longer and the right machine win be more expensive. Today, the market is placing more emphasis on genuine originality, so TE-20s showing proper, time-induced patina are in great demand.

First impressions

“I think you can tell an awful lot about a tractor by its overall appearance, Gary added. “Always be on your guard for badly painted examples. Given the popularity of this tractor, there are less scrupulous sellers around who won’t hesitate to slap paint on over rust and ingrained dirt in an effort to improve the cosmetic look, in the hope of promoting a quick sale,

“From a mechanical point of view, the good news is that the TE-20 models all benefit from a superbly robust basic design and, despite the fact that the earliest examples can now be over 75 years old, a surprising number remain fit, healthy and perfectly usable. Having said this, there’s still no excuse for not carrying out the basic, pre-purchase checks.

“The simplest of these is to assess the condition of the engine oil. Lots of owners fail to change this on a regular basis, so discovering a dipstick that’s covered In black, gloopy lubricant shouldn’t be a great surprise. But the engines are tough – especially the diesel units – and do tend to run and run despite what’s often quite serious mechanical neglect. While on the subject of oil, too many owners ignore the back end of their tractors. Most may well change the engine oil every year or two, which is fine, but very few treat the back end in the same way.

The original TE-20’s toolkit included this grease gun and the famous Ferguson spanner. The latter was designed to fit the majority of nuts on the tractor and implements, while the scale on the shaft allowed it to double as a dipstick for the fuel tank.

“There’s a dipstick at the rear which is used to check the level of the oil that supplies the gearbox, the rear axle and the hydraulic pump. Yet, despite its importance, the quality and level of this oil is too often ignored. I’ve lost count of the number of grey Fergies on which I’ve found horrible, mayonnaise-like gloop coating this dipstick, If ignored for years, this oil becomes contaminated by condensation, which detrimentally affects its lubricating performance.”

This is the often ignored dip-stick at the back of the tractor, that’s used to check the gearbox/rear axle/hydraulic level.

A slow starter?

Gary continued: “One of the biggest problems associated with the popular diesel engine is loss of compression, caused by age-related cylinder liner wear. This makes it increasingly difficult to start from cold, so if you come across one that churns over for more than about 15 seconds before catching, suspect a problem. Also, if the engine of a tractor you’re looking at has been pre-warmed by the seller before you arrive, this is potentially suspicious. Ideally you should always request to see the engine started from cold.

“Having said that, I have a TE-F 20 that suffers in just this way, and requires a squirt of starting spray to encourage it into life, but it’s not the end of the world. I appreciate that it’ll need an engine rebuild in due course, but the deterioration rate is very slow given the sort of use we give it nowadays, so I’m really not that bothered.

“Other things to check for on a pre-purchase inspection include effective brake operation, steering play, the presence of clutch judder, reliable gear selection and hydraulic pump failure. The half-shaft seals perish with age, allowing oil to leak out and contaminate the rear brake shoes. A tell-tale sign of this can be oil build-up on the inside of the rear wheel rims.

“If you detect more than about half an inch of rotational free play at the steering wheel, then there’s likely to be appreciable wear in the system – at the ends of the radius arms or in the steering box. Both parts are exposed and easy to see, to its simple to identify where the excess movement is. The H-shaped gear selector gate (hidden beneath the plate at the base of the gear lever) can wear as a result of years of harsh use, causing the stick to jump out of the gate leaving the gearbox stuck in whichever gear was selected at the time. These transmissions can’t be driven like a car; the changes have to be slower and executed with more care and mechanical sympathy.”

All components are easily accessible on the TE-20. Wear in the steering causing play at the wheel is easy to check for.

Holding fluid?

“Finally, the hydraulic pump can suffer with worn seals, preventing the unit from maintaining pressure. You can easily check for this by weighting the linkage arms and seeing if they hold. Raising an attached implement is the best way to assess this but, if that’s not possible, lift the arms then, with the engine turned off, apply your own body weight and see if the height is maintained. If the arms start to drop then pump refurbishment will be required. All of these issues can be used as good bargaining points when negotiating a price reduction with the seller.”

This is the sort of genuine patina that really adds to the desirability of a sale tractor these days.

The good news for prospective buyers is that there’s still a good number of original TE-20s out there which, despite having been worked on and off for the past 70 years, are still in reasonable condition, The model really is that durable. But, even when problems are encountered, the spare parts situation is now excellent. More or less everything you might need is available from specialist suppliers, although it should be noted that quality can vary, with much depending on where the parts have been manufactured.

Gary points out: “Lots of parts aren’t exact copies of the originals so, while they may look OK from a distance or to the casual observer, somebody with more specialist knowledge will be able to spot components – especially panels – that aren’t original. Often the shape will be slightly different, drillings will be missing or in the wrong place, swage lines might not be accurately reproduced and the metal used is often thinner.”

In more general terms, Gary added: “For beginners to the old tractor hobby, I think that the little grey Fergie provides the best way to learn rudimentary mechanics, simply because it’s so straightforward and well designed, What’s more, the Ferguson workshop manuals are absolutely superb, providing accurate, step-by-step guidance on everything from routine servicing to more involved jobs like adjusting the brakes or changing the clutch.

“Of course, Harry Ferguson knew that the support literature he provided with these tractors needed to be good because for many owners, the TE-20 represented their first experience of mechanisation. Up until that point, farm power had been supplied by horses, so relevant mechanical knowledge was non-existent. Consequently, I think that the company went over and above in terms of the help and support offered to users of its equipment, plus all those working within the dealer network. Original manuals are still available to buy nowadays, although they are becoming quite collectable, so prices are on the up. However, most have been reproduced now, so modern duplicates can be bought at reasonable prices.

“Harry Ferguson was an amazing marketeer. He established an international training centre at Stoneleigh, Warwickshire, and staff were brought in from all over the world to learn about the TE-20s and the implements designed to be used with them as part of the Ferguson System. He also created a fleet of service engineers working out of vans that would deal with customers’ problems wherever they occurred. Everything was designed to build confidence in the brand, to promote familiarity and to support owners as fully as possible, and the strategy certainly worked!”

Owners View – Gary Anderson

“I think the factors that really appeal to me about the TE-20 are its simplicity, its durability and its functionality. Those three aspects really encapsulate the model for me, and are what make it such an appealing tractor.

“I’m not a trained mechanic and yet I feel utterly confident in my self-taught ability to

deal with whatever might happen to any of my TE-20s. The tractor isn’t daunting In any respect and, with the help of the excellent period workshop manuals, you can literally tackle anything that may be needed.

“I also really appreciate the network that now exists to support this model, both among enthusiastic owners and professional specialists. The spare parts situation is brilliant nowadays, and certainly much improved on how things were back in 1999, when I bought my first little grey Fergie.

“Another real plus point – especially at the moment – is the fact that all the parts prices remain reasonable. I don’t think that there’s anything on the listing that’s made me think twice about the expense; everything seems fair and reasonable for what you’re getting.

Mudguards can rust through along the bottom edges, where dirt and moisture invariably collects on tractors which are not regularly cleaned.  Re-manufactured replacements are available but aren’t exactly the same as the originals.

“Having said that, I think that it’s wise to stick to the well-known and established suppliers. The quality can be a little variable if you start sourcing items from the ‘bargain basement’ end of the scale, but that’s just common sense, really. As always, you get what you pay for. With that in mind, the two suppliers that I’m always utterly confident to use are Fergiland (01332 862972) and Old 20 Parts Company (01332 792698) both of which, coincidentally, are in Derby. However, I hear good things about the other specialists in the market now, as supply and quality improvements are being made.

“I really can’t fault the TE-20. It’s a wondertul tractor to own and use, both for experienced enthusiasts and those who are new to the hobby.”

What to Pay

Prices for these tractors can be all over the place, depending on key factors including overall condition, the engine fitted and originality. As a general guide, though, you can still tind entry level examples available for less than £1,000, many of which will still be runners. For an average, mid-range model you should expect to pay a minimum of £2,000 while good examples start at £3,500. With the current demand for original-condition tractors with authentic patina, prices for machines like this are now pushing beyond £5,000. Continental-engined examples are becoming increasingly desirable.

Published in Classic Massey Magazine, May/June 2023


The History of the Continental

The History of the Continental

The Ferguson TE20 Continental was the first tractor to leave the factory in Coventry under the accredited name of Harry Ferguson Limited. Production ran from 1946-47 with an unknown quantity of tractors made, this being due to the engine used in the tractor. Over the years, many owners of the Continental have speculated over how many were made, in recent debates, there is an estimated 500 tractors across the country.

The engine used in this tractor is a Continental Z120 straight petrol variant which was made by the Continental Motors Company in America, namely Detroit. The factory in 1905 was state of the art and produced engines for many utility applications such as generators and trucks. Their biggest contract was in fact for the American military, of which engines were produced for military vehicles up until the end of the Second World War. After the war, like many things, the engines became surplus stock at which, after the dispersal of the Ford-Ferguson name, Harry Ferguson saw the opportunity and purchased a stock of these engines which were surplus and were imported in 1946 to the Standard Motor Company Limited’s factory.

The Continental Z 120 was the smallest variant of the Continental engine range, the other being a Z129, meaning 129 cubic inch capacity, this engine was used in American variants such as the T020. The Zl20 had an 81mm bore, producing 24HP, very similar to the standard petrol engine later used in the TEA20 and with overhead valves, this being a rarity at this time of engine production. It was a high compression engine with options to reduce this, in the form of a head spacer so paraffin could be used alongside the straight petrol.

In these early tractors, there were no greasing points on the trumpet housing castings unlike later models and there were many more preliminary features, such as aluminium bonnets likely foj’ very early examples. Continentals featured a brass badge on the front of the bonnet and casting numbers were applied to all major components, most evident on the bell housing. The gearbox was also reduced compared to later models, longer air filters were also a fitment as well as a Marvel Schebler carburettor, a common carburettor also used by Massey Harris and Allis Chalmers. An oil gauge which only read up to 40psi was also a fitment on early tractors.

Brian Pickering driving his Continental and Arnold Staples working the steerage hoe at the Humberton Working Weekend back in 2002.

The Ferguson TE20 Continental pictured at the start of this article is part way through restoration, its had three owners from new, myself being the latest. Purchased as a project in 2021 from a private collection, the cylinder head was seized as was everything else on the tractor and since then, it has had a nut and bolt mechanical rebuild including the backend and all bearings. The tractor is also fitted with a Loddons of Norfolk conversion kit, allowing the tractor to run on both petrol and paraffin and is fitted with the Zenith 24T2 carburettor.

This tractor was restored in the late 1990’s but was unused for the next 21 years but luckily retaining its original tin work. Additionally, to this article, I must thank Duncan Russell for his help with sourcing an age-related registration as the tractor now looks complete.

The Banner Lane TE20 production line.

Published in Journal No,106, Summer 2023: Fred Turner.



The FE-35 Letter Code

CRACKING THE FE-35 LETTER CODE

The following short article concerns Serial Numbers for the FE-35 range of tractors. The codes for the commission plate numbers are to be found in the workshop manual. The engine codes should be available in some service bulletins or even from Massey Ferguson. I believe the following analysis to be accurate but it is drawn from observations made here in Jersey over the years. As far as I can ascertain, the system of code letters on commission plates and engine blocks is similar, although different letters are used on each. There does not appear to be a direct link between numerals, other than that lower serial numbers are usually reflected as lower engine numbers. As a result, if the commission plate is missing from the tractor, it is not possible to gain a very accurate idea of the tractor’s age from the engine number alone

COMMISSION PLATE

This is found on the lower right side of the dash board, next to the ignition key. On it will be found (if still legible) patent numbers in force at the time the tractor was built. Stamped at the bottom is the tractor serial number, which is comprised of three or four letters followed by the production number.

First Letter
This denotes the type of tractor, namely:
standard agricultural (the majority), vineyard, industrial, high clearance:

Tractor type
Standard agricultural: Code letter S
Vineyard: Code letter V
Industrial: Code letter J
High clearance: Code letter C

Second letter
This denotes the type of engine: petrol, vaporising oil, lamp oil, diesel:
Engine type: Compression ratio
Petrol: 6:1  Code G
High altitude petrol: 6.6:1 Code H
Vaporising oil: 5:1 Code K
Lamp oil: 4.3:1 Code L
Diesel: 23C (4 cylinder): 20.1 Code D
Diesel: Perkins A3.152: 17.4: 1 Code N

Third letter
This denotes the type of clutch and therefore gearbox details:
Clutch type
Single clutch: Code letter F
Dual clutch:  Code letter M

Fourth letter
This denotes special features:
Differential lock: Code Y

ENGINE NUMBERS
On spark ignition engines, the numbers are to be found on the left side of the engine between the oil filler cap and the coil. This practice was continued through from the first TEA-20s. On the 23C diesel engine (as with the TEF-20 before it) the number is on the right side of the block, at the front, beneath the manifold and above the dynamo.

Prefix letters
There are two prefix letters. All engines which I have seen have S as the first letter. This is followed by:
Engine type:
Petrol: Code letter SF
T.V.O.: Code letter SG
L.O.: Code letter SH
23C: Code letter SJ

After these two letters come the engine production numbers. Lastly come the suffix letters.

Suffix letters
Petrol engines have three. All other engines have two. an all engines the first letter after the numerals is an E, denoting an engine number and the very last letter in the sequence denotes clutch type:
Clutch type
Single clutch S
Dual clutch D

Thus, engine numbers/letters on T.V.O., L.O. and 23C blocks all end in either ES or ED. Petrol engines have an extra letter between E and S or O.
Engine type: Code letters
Petrol, standard compression 6: 1 E L
Petrol, high compression 6.6:1 E H

Thus petrol engine numbers/letters all end in one of the following: ELS or EHS for a single clutch
and ELO or EHD for a dual clutch.

With reference to the 35s fitted with Perkins engines, as yet I haven’t seen enough examples of numbers to determine a logic. Also, I believe, some 35s capable of running on butane gas were built but I do not have any details of serial numbers.

Some “living” examples:

Commission plate: SGF61182
Engine number: SF9944ELS

From the commission plate we can deduce that this is a standard (S) petrol (G) single clutch (F) tractor. The engine number tells us that it is petrol (F) 6: 1 compression ratio (L) and has a single clutch and corresponding flywheel (S).

Commission plate: SHM324792
Engine number: SF40638EHD

The commission plate tells us that this is a standard (S) high altitude petrol (H) dual clutch (M) tractor. The engine number denotes petrol (F) 6.6: 1 compression ratio (H) and a dual clutch (M) with corresponding flywheel (D).

Commission plate: SKM 252026
Engine number: SG11519EO

The commission plate states that this is a standard agricultural tractor (S) T.V.O. (K) and dual clutch (M). The engine number tells us that it is T.V.O. (G) and has a dual clutch (D).

Commission plate: SDM12847
Engine number: SJ8734ED

We can see from the commission plate that this is a standard tractor (S) with a 23C diesel engine (D) fitted with a dual clutch (M). The engine number shows (J) for 23C diesel, fitted with dual clutch (D).

Commission plate: SNMY375106
Engine number: 19D6821C

This is a standard tractor (S) with a Perkins A 3.152 engine (N) a dual clutch (M) and a differential lock (Y). As mentioned earlier I cannot tie in the engine number on the Perkins diesels.

The TE-20 range of serial numbers was distributed to all club members about five years ago in the form of a booklet produced by Massey Ferguson. It may still be possible for individual members to obtain a copy by writing directly to the M. F. Sales Support Centre. Finally, with reference to FE-35 decals, our tractor SGF89374 engine no SF13127ELS, is an early example of the red and grey colour scheme but I am afraid that the bonnet has been repainted, the decals having been scraped off.

Raoul Le Miere, St. Lawrence, Jersey

Published in Journal No. 24 Winter 1996/97


Massey-Ferguson No.703 Baler

The Massey Ferguson No. 703 Baler and its Place in the Great Scheme of Things

Part 1 : PREAMBLE

For those members unfamiliar with the equipment, the No.703 baler produces a high density bale, that is to say a bale which is highiy compacted. But there are low density alternatives in the shape of trussers, medium balers and presses. The incorporation of ancient terms into new technology which had its own terms soon led to some confusion in terminology overall. For example, I have before me the 1894 advertisements of three American makers of almost identical high density balers. One is described as a baler, one as a hay press and the third as a baling press. In more modem times, the Welgar WSA 350 was described as a low density, press type, pick-up baler. I shall try first to explain some of the differences.

The mechanical trusser, which is for static use, is an outsize version of the binder deck and produces a low density truss with ragged, open ends. It might be mounted on a two wheeled carriage or be fitted to a thrasher. Its natural successor, the stationary medium baler, also works by means of tines pulling material into a collecting area but because of its “press” operation the truss is very much squarer. Press operation means that pressure to form the bale is applied from the sides whereas for high density the pressure is applied from one end. These later medium balers are still being used behind the thrasher to bunch thatching straw because the press action does not damage the material. One might quite legitimately caIl the medium baler a hay or straw press.

There were pick-up presses as well as pick-up balers and these presses were still being made after the pick-up baler was established. I believe the pick-up press was less expensive but it also survived because there were circumstances in which the low density bale had advantages: it was much used in the Fens for building root clamps; it made it possible to pick up hay earlier, especially if the farm utilized barn drying; it was more convenient for breaking out litter and foodstuff; even if rather loose and untidy, it was lighter to handle and used common binder twine. I have even been told that the flatter trusses could be used like tiles to roof bale stacks.

High density baling was pioneered in America by a Mr Dederick in the early 1800s. He designed a “beater” press whereby an upright frame was fed with loose hay and the beater was raised much in the action of a pile driver. When the beater was tripped it dropped into the baling chamber with great force and the process was repeated. This produced a bale some 24x42x42 inches weighing from 300 to 4001 bs. This device established the principle that high density is achieved by ramming material into a confined space. In due course smaller, portable but horizontal versions were made in which horizontal ramming was powered by means of horse-gin or steam driven belt puIley.

By the turn of the century the situation enjoyed by the the hay market had transformed the high density baler into a major player in the American agricultural economy. The hay crop for 1893 was greater in value than any other agricultural product. Estimated output was 65,250,000 tons with a value of 590,000,000 dollars, twice as much as the wheat crop.

The high density stationary baler or “wire tie” (see Photo on page opposite) more commonly known in this country, never really lost its massive proportions. Its principal employment remained behind the thrasher as an alternative to trussing or elevating the material loose. One of the best known was the Jones. Its successors were smaller but still notably long equipment of heavy build mounted on a heavy, four-wheel chassis. The high density principles to be incorporated into pick-up baler design were thus established, that material be delivered to a bale chamber where a ram would repeatedly collect it, drive it forward and so build up a bale against resistance. However, it was first necessary to pick up the material.

For decades the towed elevator had permitted mechanical pick-up from the windrow. Towed behind a trailer, it picked up hay by means of tines, carried it to a good height and tipped it over the top to fall into the trailer. The mechanism was ground driven. Built mostly of thin section wood, the towed elevator is lightweight by virtue of quite flimsy construction, very flexible in use and susceptible to damage.

The requirement, therefore, was to combine two entirely different types of machine, one a massive, static device operated by brute force within narrow confines, the other a large, gangling device of flexible construction designed for mobility and to cover large areas. Much original thinking was required if these two sets of entirely different engineering principles were to be reconciled into the pick-up baler, it was not easy and the problems overcome at every level through several decades make interesting reading.

Ruston Hornsby 1russer mounted on a Garvie Thrasher (Mill) with Ransomes Wire-Tie Baler in attendance. Part of the collection of member Peter Small and photographed during the 1998 AGM at Cupar by Tim Willis.

John Cousins No. 701


The Massey Ferguson No. 703 Pick-Up Baler and its Place in the Great Scheme of Things

Part 2 : POTTED HISTORY OF PICK-UP BALERS

As with much agricultural design, the development of the pick-up baler began in America where wheeled machinery had been taken to the windrow and hay brought to it for round baling as early as 1908. Straw was mostly carted off the field for thrashing. The arrival of the combine harvester changed this because the thrashing residue now began to remain on the field. The early combines were designed to spread the residue. But most farms were mixed and farmers refused to waste their straw in this way. The answer was to disconnect the drive to the straw spreader and so permit the combine to drop the residue in a windrow.

With the return of the windrow the pick¬up elevator was back in business. But times were moving and the fear was that much of the saving of time and cost brought about by the combine harvester would be nullified by inefficient straw handling. As one American article put it in 1933, there was a need to take the machine to the crop and v, salvage straw left in the field by the grain combine at negligible cost and at the same time leave it in the bale ready for market or for the most economical storage and convenience in handling Because of the combination of these functions, the first square bale machines were called Hay & Straw Combines but the confusion of the name and the fact that the description “pick-up baler” was being used in the same breath soon resulted in the latter term becoming general.

Even with the growing use of combine harvesters, the development of the pick-up baler was still driven by the common need to harvest grass and legumes, notably the bulky alfalfa cut three or more times a year. The pick-up elevator and the baling press had been in use for many years but the engineering principles involved in their combination were new, especially in the matter of reconciling weight and capacity. Some first principles in the new design turned out to be the right ones: balance upon a single axle to follow ground contour; shortest possible turning radius; the building in of safety clutches. Others, such as the ability to handle different types of crop, took much longer. Many of the first mechanical features we would recognise today: a tined cylindrical pick-up, an elevator and a cross conveyor produced a flow of material into a bale chamber. The bale was tied, first by wire twisted by hand, then automatically using a heavy twine. The first pick-up balers were still labour intensive. In the Thirties, for example, the Arm Arbor baler required an on-board crew of three: one to monitor and control the cross conveying of material to the bale chamber and two to tie and dispose of the bale.

From the beginning it was intended that both high and low density pick-up machines should be capable of static baling and this led to a variety of low density equipments. Some manufacturers (the Claas Pick-up and Stationary Presses are a good example) made it possible to remove the pick-up table so that the machine could be used in front of a thrashing drum in the same way as the straw trusser. There were stationary medium balers which could be fitted with a Draper pick-up kit and towed in reverse and others which had no pick-up capability. Some of these were produced into the early Sixties in place of the now defunct trusser.

The market leader in this country was Lorant, as this extract from a February 1949 Engineering Report on Agricultural Machinery shows. It was produced by an independent study group called Political and Economic Planning, which believed the 19405 might be known to future generations as the age of the Second Agricultural Revolution because of farm mechanisation.
“The biggest contribution to labour¬saving in recent years has been made by the fully automatic one-man pick-up baler, which was developed first in the U.S. and later in this country by the Hertfordshire firm of D. Lorant. This machine, as the name implies, requires a single worker to gather hay and bale it. Tn general, British production has been rather of stationary wiretying balers which need additional labour for the knotting operation, while imported machines have been only semi-automatic and have also required an extra pair of hands .

It seems that between 1944-48 some 380 machines were replaced or brought into use in England and Wales and that in 1947 some 170 were manufactured in this country and 380 imported. I am not familiar with in-house development at Lorant but post war the company imported the Claas Pick-up and Stationary Presses and in 1948 began to manufacture them under licence. Ransomes acquired the firm in 1951 and sold the products as Ransomes Lorant. There was an engine powered pick-up with removable table, a PTO version and a stationary medium baler which could be converted by fitting a Draper pick-up kit. These were all low density equipments and I do not believe the company ever made a high density baler.

From the beginning there was a debate as to whether the pick-uip baler should be PTO driven or have its own on-board engine, which debate did not finally conclude in favour of the PTO until the late Fifties. The other developments of significance were the steady improvement in conveying material from elevator to bale chamber, introduction of the guillotine into the baling chamber making it easier to pull the bale apart and the move to automatic tying. By the late Forties the pick-up baler was more or less in its final form, typified perhaps by the PTO driven International No.45 introduced in 1948, which I am told was widely available in this country and is of fond memory.

John Cousins No. 701


The Massey Ferguson No. 703 Pick-Up Baler and its Place in the Great Scheme of Things

Part 3: Enter Ferguson

To my knowledge Harry Ferguson played no part in the events described in Part 2. His essential interests were in tillage, planting and husbandry plus general work around the farm in which his tractor could play a key role. I referred to his belated arrival upon the cereal harvesting scene in Issue No 24, writing in conjunction with the late Richard Dowdeswell, a sorely missed storehouse of all things Ferguson. It began with the provision addition of a pick-up baler to the Ferguson inventory.

The B-EO-20 Side Mounted Baler was produced in the USA for the TO tractors as one of the very interesting “Tractor Mate” series of side mounted equipments of which the Ferguson Tractor-Mounted Combine would have formed part had it gone ahead. As with the other Tractor Mate equipments,
the tractor was reversed into position, hitching was automatic and the whole process was claimed to take only 90 seconds. Normal drive was by PTO but a Ferguson on-board engine could be fitted instead with a weight penalty of 850 Ibs. There was also for auxiliary drive to be taken to the outboard wheel.

As far as I know the Company produced only two models. These were the B-EO-20 Side-Mounted Baler, which seems to have been in production 1954-1956, and the FE-12, probably in service from 1957. I do not know if these equipments were designed and developed inhouse or under contract and [ do not know when the FE-12 ceased production.

It seems there were problems and that comparatively few of these balers were sold. They must now be highly collectable. Should one of our American members be so fortunate as to possess one or have access to one in a collection then I am sure Alan Dunderdale would welcome some decent photographs for the Club’s archive. I have never heard that any of these balers reached the UK.

Presumably because of the poor sales performance of the B-EO-20, the successor Ferguson F-12 was of conventional design, a pro driven machine of modest dimensions which was probably developed in Canada. It was said to be not unlike the Massey-Harris No. 3, which might support one contention that it was designed by Massey-Harris¬-Ferguson. It was certainly built in Toronto but I do not know for how long or if it was also built in the USA. It seems most unlikely that any of this model ever reached these shores either.

Ferguson B-E0-20 side mounted baler

In Australia, some time before 1956, Ferguson marketed the Ferguson FA-700 pick-up baler. I assume FA stood for Ferguson Australia. It was driven by governed TE-A 20 engine and there was no pro option, at least not at first, and it was presented being towed by TE-D 20 by means of the pick-up hitch, a practice confined to engine powered balers.

In the UK, from around 1956 to 1958, and possibly from as early as 1953, Massey-¬Harris-Ferguson sold an almost identical baler as the No 701, except that there was now a pro option. Whereas one is tempted to assume this must be a development of the FA-700, a very similar machine had
previously been marketed under Massey-Harris colours. If it is, in fact, an old Massey-¬Harris equipment now available to the combined Massey- Harris- Ferguson market, what was it doing in Australia under Ferguson colours as the FA-700 ?

I have only ever examined one 701 baler and it was fitted with the Standard TE-D 20 engine (earlier models had the two cylinder Armstrong¬Siddeley diesel. Very occasionally one still comes across red painted engines in Ferguson tractors and these are replacement engines salvaged from 701 balers.

The engine could be dismounted out of season and used as a power source around the farm. The 701 is most notably distinguished by the prominent inline wadboard, similar in appearance and action to the “nodding donkey” pumps in oil fields and with a rise and fall of almost two feet. Also the cross conveyor housing is very prominent and round topped. It was briefly listed in conjunction with the 703 as a heavy duty baler. In all, the 701 looks to be much older than it can be and it must be the last of the wad board balers. But whatever its original colours, I do not know when it first saw the light of day.

I shall look at the introduction of the No. 703 in Part 4.
John Cousins No. 701


The Massey Ferguson No.703 Pick-Up Baler and its place in the Great Scheme of Things

The No.701 Pick-Up Baler

Further to Part 3 of the article in Issue No.42, I am indebted to Andrew Boorman for much of the following material.

The baler was introduced by Massey-¬Harris in 1951 and fitted with onboard engine. At first this was a Wisconsin V4 but Andrew believes that not many machines were so fitted and none in this country that he ever heard of. Here the original engine was the Coventry Victor flat 4 but it was prone to oil leaks, which attracted dust leading on to abrasion and overheating. So it was replaced by the very efficient Armstrong-Siddeley two cylinder diesel, which gave universal satisfaction. In fact so successful were these engines that many of them entered upon a second life driving water pumps in Cyprus when their parent balers were eventually scrapped.

In due course the Standard engine fitted to the TE20 tractor was offered as an alternative and this may have started with the petrol engine. I am doubtful that the Ferguson engine ever superseded the Armstrong-Siddeley diesel for in 1958/59, when the new Massey-Ferguson was intro¬ducing its range of equipment, the No.701 was listed alongside the No.703 (soon to replace it) with the option of PTO drive, TE20 Standard TVO or the A-S diesel.

I am also indebted to Alwyn Marwood’s coincidental article on his No.701 Baler on page 17 of Issue No.42 in which he observes upon the onboard FE35 TVO engine, presumably another optional fitment between 1957-58. If original, the engine suggests that his baler was produced by Massey-Harris-Ferguson in spite of its Massey-Harris markings, the latter being in accordance with the “Twin Track” policy then in force.

Part 4: Enter the No.703 Pick-up Baler

(Instruction Book (1st Printing) No.703 Pick-up Baler)

In late 1958 early 1959, a reshaped Massey-Ferguson consolidated and relaunched its range of equipment with some impressive new additions. The one of immediate interest was the No.703 baler. It was designed for the TE20 and FE35 tractors but it was illustrated in use with the FE35 and our experience is with this combination. It was described as “the very latest baler design” and “the most practical, most profitable baler ever produced”. Be that as it may, it was certainly smaller than the No.701 (almost 4ft shorter and 14 inches narrower), lighter (comparing engine models 1500lbs less), altogether more compact and a very modern looking piece of equipment which does not look out of place today. Whereas the No.701 bale size was fixed at 14xl8x36, now it was variable at 14x16x20-45 to meet a wider range of demands in all materials. Pick-up was reduced from 52 to 48 inches but an improved packer feed is said to have maintained volume output. Added advant¬ages were that a new· “Gentle-quick” design minimized leaf loss and damage between pick-up and bale chamber while pick-up, packer and bale discharge functions were now all visible from the tractor seat. Bales could be dropped to the rear, delivered to a sledge by way of optional chute and sledge hitch or deflected to the left by removing part of a new split tailgate.

As far as possible, “built in” lubrication was now provided to the new baler by means of oil impregnated bearings designed to last the life of the machine, although a few drops of light oil might be added annually or every 20,000 bales. For the rest, grease nipples were reduced to six, three oilers were provided on the PTO shafts, two gearbox levels had to be maintained and one level in the packer bearer housing.

The No.703 marks the final displace¬ment of engine power. We have two Instruction Books, the first an undated 1st Printing in which the emphasis is definitely upon the engine powered version and PTO text is confined to six half lines on page 7 under General Details and three half lines on page 8 under Safety Precautions. The second is an undated 2nd Printing, annotated as being applicable to balers after Serial No.4766, in which the emphasis has shifted entirely to PTO drive, which merits its own Section 7 of seven pages. I would add that the weight penalty of engine power was only 140lbs. This was achieved by fitting either a 12 bhp TVO or 13.5 bhp petrol engine or later a small diesel. I do not know what these engine choices were, although I might guess at the Armstrong-Siddeley two cylinder for the diesel. The PTO requirement was 535 rpm for optimum working.

There was also a No.703B windrow pick-up attachment, which could be fitted to the MF726, 780 and new 735 combine tables. This made it possible to pick up and thrash difficult crops which were best swathed first and left to dry for a period, such as oil seed rape and some seeds.

These combine harvesters could also be fitted with their own low density baler, a Raussendorf Straw Press. Raussendorf were pre-war manufacturers of sufficient standing for Massey-Harris to act as their agents and distributors. In 1945 Herman Raussendorf found his factory in the Russian Zone and relocated to Eschwege where Massey-Harris asked him to design a new press and financed its production. Eventually Massey-Harris took him over but kept the name alive. Raussendorf now joined the design team which produced the small but very successful No.630 combine, which was a parallel development to the No.735.

A Contemporary Comparison of the No.703 with other Balers

In early 1961 Massey-Ferguson compiled for the use of staff a product comparison table. This compared those equipments from other manufacturers which were most in competition with the No.703 baler. These were: the International B-46; New Holland Super Hayliner No.68; the Jones Minor Mk V; the Bamford BL48; the David Brown “Albion”; the Welgar AP12.

Comparison was made under specific headings: the method of drive; the number of bales/minute; pick-up width; transport width; the method of cross feed to the bale chamber; the number of ram operations/minute; size of the bale cross section; bale length; the overall weight of the machine.

Much of the performance detail was quite similar. The No.703 being shown as PTO driven, only three of the other machines now offered an engine option. Bale delivery varied between 5-lO/minute, the fastest rate being claimed by the Jones. At 54 inches pick-up width, two were smaller and the rest larger. The No.703 had the narrowest transport width by up to 5 inches. The No.703 was the only machine with under-acting tine cross feed, the Jones had overacting, the Welgar had side-acting and the rest still used the auger. Most machines had ram speeds around 70/minute, the Jones ran to 80 and the Welgar 85. Except the Welgar (14″x19″), all bale cross sections were the same at 14″xl8″. All machines could vary bale length, overall between 12-52 inches. At working weight of 2900lbs, only the Jones was heavier at 3800lbs. The Welgar weighed in at 2800lbs, the rest closely varied between 2460-2520lbs.

Published in Journals 40 Summer 2002, 42 Winter 2002, and 43 Spring 2003, John Cousins.


Meadows Engine Ferguson TE-D 20 Pt.1

Meadows Engine Ferguson TE-D 20:

Serial Number 124639
Made 19th March 1950 and registered September 1950

It was a well known fact that Harry Ferguson was not keen on diesel engines, but of course the farmers were. It did not take Frank Perkins long to offer a conversion kit to enable the installation of their P3 (TA) unit to be fitted retrospectively to TE20 tractors. Just for the record is should be noted that Frank Perkins had installed, in his own Ford 2N, a Perkins P4 (TA) and had used it successfully on his own farm.

So eventually in 1950 Harry Ferguson realised that he would have to concede to customer requirements and be able to market a diesel engined TE20. To this end he commissioned three diesel engine manufacturers to provide a TE20 fitted with their own engine for evaluation and field testing. The Standard Motor Company Ltd was the obvious contender so they invited Arthur Freeman Sanders, a light weight diesel engine expert of the time, to work with their own development engineers to produce a prototype engine. Prior to this work for Standard he had designed and built two six cylinder diesel car engines: one he installed in a Studebaker and the other in an Alvis TA21 which he had bought new minus the normal three litre petrol engine (see Alvis Three Litre in Detail by David Culshaw). So it is not surprising to find that to meet Standards request he followed a similar layout, but only four cylinders.

Another contender was Perkins of Peterborough, who, using one of their already available conversions was able to submit that. It is worth noting that the petrol engine of the early TEA20 produced 23.9 bhp at 2000 rpm while the P3 diesel engine produced 32 bhp at the same speed.

The late Harold Beer puts the Meadows tractor to the test.

Another Meadows prototype being prepared to be sent for testing

The final offering for evaluation was built up by Meadows of Wolverhampton, an established firm of engine builders, both petrol and diesel; they were part of a group of engine builders that included Brush Mirrlees and Petter, collectively A.B.O.E.

Before going on to set out details of this engine I feel it appropriate to briefly outline how it eventually came to Coldridge. It was back in 1999 when I was researching for information about the Ferguson LTX prototype tractors and talking to people who had been involved in its develoPI1lent and field testing. It was my intention to commission a model maker, Paul Dimock of Somerset, to produce a limited edition of fifty models in 18th scale of this tractor. It was the late Erik Frediksen (an ex Massey Ferguson design engineer) who kindly arranged for me to meet up with seven or eight men who had been working on that project. It was Nigel Liney a field test driver who asked me if I would like to see an unusual Ferguson TE20, of course I was keen. Yes, there it was, grown in with trees and brambles, no wheels and a big hole in the crankcase on the oil gallery side of the engine where number three connection rod had smashed its way through.

The Meadows tractor arrives at the workshop of David White after 40 years out in the open

A big hole in the crankcase where number three connecting rod smashed through.

I asked Nigel if he would be willing to visit the owner, to handover my written offer so that, hopefully, I could buy it: sadly my offer was turned down.
Anyway, it was eventually bought by David White of Ormskirk a most competent agricultural engineer specialising in vintage machinery who restored it back to full working order – a monumental task.

The story of its recovery and rebuild was fully dealt with in two issues of Vintage Tractor, June/July and August/September .
2004. Having viewed the tractor back in 1999 I made a point of writing to David to compliment him on his amazing achievement, adding the point that if he ever decided to sell it perhaps he would be good enough to give me first refusal. He offered it to me in October 2005, I did not argue over his asking price because I felt it very fair considering the colossal amount of work he’d put into its rebuild. He phoned me on a Wednesday and delivered it to Coldridge the following Saturday, along with several of the parts which he had replaced.

The bent and broken conrod

The exhaust ports were choked with carbon.

About the engine. It is quite clear that Meadows/Petter produced the block to fit exactly in place of the Standard petrol/TVO engine. As can be seen from the photographs it follows the flange of the clutch bell housing exactly and although the cylinder head was a purpose made casting, the sump was taken directly from a Standard built petrol engine, likewise the water pump, oil filter (early vehicle type) and the oil filler cap. The fuel tank was especially fabricated with a saddle base so that it sat neatly over the engine, which is slightly higher by about two inches (50 mm) but the bonnet closes normally to the dash panel. The engine is a direct injection unit fitted with a CAV inline pump with an excess fuel button. The 6 volt starter motor is retained, but the tractor has a 12 volt battery. Needless to say it fires up instantly at below zero. It has been used at an autumn ploughing day on hard red Devon soil hitched to a MF three furrow 793 plough set at 12 inches (300 mm). It purred along in second gear as sweet as a nut. When the late Harold Beer was driving it he decided to try it in third gear, it worked but the black smoke was disgusting, a not to be repeated test. As Nigel Liney told me back in 1999 the Meadows engine tractor had the best pulling characteristics against the Perkins and the Standard 20C. I would certainly validate that!

Engine designation and specification:
• Meadows engine No.BXA 105 Type 4DC 1/35
• Bore 80mm, stroke 110mm, capacity 2212cc. Output not known as I do not have a dynamometer.
• The Standard Petrol engine: Bore 80mm, stroke 92mm

© Mike Thorne, first published, Ferguson Club Journal, Issue No.90 Winter 2018/19


Meadows Engine Ferguson TE-D 20 Pt.2

Meadows Engine Ferguson TED20, Mike Thorne, Journal 52, Spring 2006

It was back in 1998 when doing some research in the Midlands for the 1/18 scale models of the Ferguson LTX tractor which I had produced and ready for sale by April 2000. At this time I had the privilege to meet and talk with many of those people who were involved in its development and field testing. One of the team was Nigel Liney and it was he who told me about other evaluation work being done by Harry Ferguson Ltd when they were looking at the production of a diesel version of the TE20. Apparently they asked three engine manufacturers to offer a suitably sized engine for fitment to the TE20. The thinking behind this was to enable the Ferguson people to have a good opportunity to give each engine installation a thorough and long term assessment.

The three firms asked to supply a unit each were Standard Motor Co. Ltd of Coventry, Frank Perkins Ltd of Peterborough and Meadows Engines Ltd of Wolverhampton.

As the Standard Motor Co did not have a diesel unit in production at the time and were obviously hopeful of securing the contract, so they sought the services of Freeman Sanders who were experts in small diesel engine design, living and worked at Penzance in Cornwall. He had already developed a lightish weight 6 cylinder indirect injection high speed auto motive type of diesel engine and had two built up. One he installed in a Studebaker and the other he installed in a new Alvis TA2 which was supplied to him by the factory but less its normal petrol engine. The general layout of this 6 cyliinder engine is remarkably close to what he eventually helped to develop for the Standard Motor Co. for installation in the TE20 and for some other applications.

The next offering came from F Perkins who by this time 1949/19S0 had in their range a suitable and proven engine in the form of the TA. TA = tractor Application. Perkins had been supplying these engines as kits for retrospective installation in various small tractors i.e. the Allis B thc Ford Ferguson 8N and of course the TE20.

The fact is that Nigel Liney managed to tip the test TE20 converted to diesel with the P3 engine on to it’s back whilst ploughing with a three furrow plough: the driving method with a TED20 was to be flat out in 2nd gear, lift the plough out at the headland and spin through 90° on the independent brake but it did not work too well with the test P3!

The third diesel engine to be evaluated was produced by Meadows of Wolver­hampton and is now the main subject of this article.

The same team of people had also been involved in the testing and evaluation program of the three different models of diesel engines fitted to a normal TE20 Ferguson, as mentioned earlier. Nigel knew where the Meadows one had ended up, in fact at one time he had tried to buy it. So onc afternoon we drove about 6 miles from Nigel’s house to view the tractor. This we did. but the view was very restricted: the tractor was missing part of its front axle and totally engulfed in trees and brambles making it quite impossible to get to it at close quarters. As we drove away I spoke enthusiastically to Nigel that I would really like to buy and restore this Ferguson. Nigel warned me that a connecting rod had broken and gone through the crank case. I was not put off by this ‘little problem’. An offer was duly made to the owner who de­clined to sell: disappointed I accepted the fact, but asked Nigel to keep and eye on it!

The next I heard about the Meadows Engined Ferguson when an article appeared in Vintage Tractor Magazine – of June/July 2004 by coincidence alongside an article Tim Bolton had written about the Coldridge Collection here in Devon – a strange coincidence!

Tim Bolton’s article spawned two issues in his magazine the one just mentioned and Dec/J an 2004/2005. These articles described how the tractor had been bought by engineer and restoration expert David White from near Ormskirk. On taking the tractor back to his works he set about the monumental task of repairing the engine not just the big hole in the side – which by the way had been part of the oil gallery! This had been caused by the breaking of number three connecting rod. David carefully made a pattern to the shape of the missing piece of the crank case and oil way about 9″ long and 31h” at the widest part. From this pattern David had accurately made a piece of cast steel and then he welded it into place on the crank case.

The pattern which was made to repair the crank case.

Next he turned his attention to the crank shaft; which was about I 00 thou undersize on number three pin. The journals were turned down to clean them up metal sprayed to slightly oversize then ground back to their standard size. The hand made connecting rods were in reasonable order except for number three which had to be repaired and rebored to size. David was able to find that Toyota shells fitted the main journals whilst Jaguar thrusts were used on the mains. The shells for the big end bearing were Petter as were the original and replacement pistons: the bores were sleeved and bored back to original size. The CAY series A fuel injection pump had to have new and slightly different bearings/seals fitted so a bit of machining had to be done to the pump body. New elements were fitted at the same time. Sourcing suitable fuel and oil filter elements proved difficult but again Petter parts seemed the most appropriate. It is interesting to note that the oil bath air intake filter is a Donaldson almost exactly the same as fitted to the Ferguson Brown in 1936! The engine is of direct injection design and fitted with a 6 volt electrical system: the starter motor is a Lucas M459 being a simple Bendix drive type unlike the normal pre-engagement type fitted to most diesel engines. I think the Turner Yeoman of England tractor had a similar Bendix drive. Nigel Liney recalls that as part of the winter test program the three diesel engine TE20 were left out overnight in freezing conditions so that in the morning the cold starting characteristics could be assessed. In this area the Meadows did not fare very well, no doubt the 6 volt system was the main cause, to overcome this drawback the test team would light a small fire under the tractor to warm the oil prior to attempting to start the engine: this usually worked. David fitted the tractor with a Heavy Duty 12 volt battery that fits neatly into the original battery carrier, this works well but several attempts have to be made to start it, because as soon as the engine fires the pinion is thrown out of engagement with the flywheel, as we know diesel engines often need a bit of cranking. Being a direct injection design there are no cold starting aids fitted apart from an excess fuel button on the pump and a heater plug on the inlet manifold. So far the tractor starts OK, although it does ‘hunt’ a bit when cold. Oil pressure is very good about 60psi, as is its lugging ability, I am keen to get it coupled up to a three furrow Ferguson plough when the Spring cultivations get underway.

Finishing touches to the restoration.

It is thought that this Meadows engine type 4DC 1/35 was one of a small batch especially built up to meet the requirement of the TE20. It will be noted that the front axle carrier bracket fits very neatly to the front of the engine whilst the rear lines up exactly with the clutch bell housing of the TE20. Interestingly the sump is directly from a Standard Motor Co. petrol engine, as used on a TED20, the fuel tank looks similar but, is obviously a one off and is rather saddled to enable it to fit over the engine and just clear the bonnet. The filler is to the rear of the tank and is fitted with a push and turn type brass cap, but it is retained by a short chain in exactly the same way as the Ferguson screw type cap is. David found on the underside of the bonnet three layers of paint, the base Ferguson light grey, second coat the grey/green it has now been repainted and on top of that Ferguson light grey again. To complete the restoration David had new Meadows name plates made for each side of the tractor as the original had deteriorated badly, but was sufficiently intact to enable replicas to be made. Prior to David White buying the tractor the previous owner had taken the wise precaution to remove the original Meadows badge from the bonnet grill for safe keeping in his house. When the tractor changed hands the original badge was part of the deal. Fearing that if he put the original badge back on the tractor it might go missing, David decided to have a replica made for fitment to the tractor: this is the one you see at the present time.

Following the articles in Vintage Tractor I wrote to David congratulating him on his purchasing and wishing him well with the massive engine restoration project, I also indicated my interest in perhaps buying the tractor if for whatever reason he might wish to sell it. Late October 2005 David phoned me to say he had decided to sell the tractor and hoped I would buy it. We agreed a price on the Wednesday and by the following Saturday David arrived here at Coldridge with the Meadows engined Ferguson on his trailer. I was delighted, a unique tractor I had known about in 1998 had finally come to the Coldridge Collection just over seven years later. Roll on the Spring.

Basic details of this tractor

  • Registration Number KDU 559 first registered 14th September 1950
  • Tractor Number TED 124039 completed 22nd March 1950.
  • Engine Meadows inline’ 4-cylinder overhead valve direct injection type DC 1/35.
  • Bore and stroke 80mm x 110mm
  • Capacity 2212cc.
  • Fuel Pump CAV type 17A with pneumatic governor
  • 6 volt electrics with 12 volt battery!

Any further information on this project would be most welcome just phone Mike on 07966 328 600.

Photographs by Mike Thorne, Tim Bolton and David White. Thanks to Tim and David for the information and being so helpful.

Mike Thorne, first published in Journal 52, Spring 2006.